"Neda Soltani vs. Barack Obama = The 'Voice' vs. The 'Empty Teleprompter'!"

On Saturday, the 20th of June, an Iranian woman named Neda Soltani was reportedly standing next to her university professor and some other students, among the crowds of protesters, when a Basij driving by on a motorcycle shot into the crowd. They are unsure whether the gunman aimed or not. The point is that these people do not have weapons of any kind, they were peacefully demonstating, and look what has happened.

This is the account according to Wikipedia:
"Neda Soltani (Persian: ندا سلطانی ; born 1982, died June 20, 2009; age 26–27) was an Iranian woman whose killing, during the 2009 Iranian election protests, was captured on video by bystanders. The graphic videos were posted on the Internet, and her name quickly became a rallying cry for the opposition. Neda means "voice" or "calling" in Persian, and she has been referred to as the "voice of Iran" and "a symbol of pro-democracy protesters battering the Islamic regime" in the world."

A very eloquent and heartfelt plea was posted by a representative of the Iranian people, explaining how they felt, and asking for our help — the world's help — with this situation, by not acknowledging the fraudulent regime of Ahmadinejad. Please watch the following video in it's entirety:



While this was going on, CBS White House correspondent Mark Knoller was making an in depth report, shown here. It detailed important things that affected our country such as what topping Obama chose to put on his frozen custard, and whether Sasha and Malia chose waffle cones (probably the more appropriate choice for Obama) or Brownie sundaes, plus the most important issue of the day: what flavor Puppy pop did they finally choose for Bo, the Obama's dog.

Obama couldn't be bothered to go against his buddy, Ahmadinejad, or put himself in a bad light if, heaven forbid, the opposion party won the election, because it looked like that was who the people favored, so Obama gave the lame excuse that we shouldn't meddle in Iranian affairs because, he said "the last thing that I want to do is to have the United States be a foil for, uh, those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States."

WHAT? What is he talking about? He doesn't even make any sense! He should take a lesson from one of his predecessors. Please watch this video:




Finally, after being pressured into some sort of decisive action and after being ridiculed because of his inaction and apparent indecision, Obama finally made a strong comment on Iran, declaring that the international community was ‘appalled and outraged’ by what he called the threats and violence that had followed the Iranian election. It's too bad that he had to be forced into doing what he should have done instinctively as not only an American, but as our president. He's not only an empty Telepromter, but he's an empty suit as well!

Read more: Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Cynde

Please visit my other blogs:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff. Thank you!

Crescent shapes with and without Islamic intent: the Obama logo example

For those of you that worship Obama, you may want to take a look at this:


THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY: ALEC RAWLS

The two most widely recognized symbols of Islam are the crescent and the sword. Kind of amusing that Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign logo can be seen to feature both a crescent and a curved Islamic scimitar:



The crescent shape in Obama’s logo has the round part on top, just like a traditional crescent shaped mihrab (the Mecca direction indicator around which every mosque is built). The animation shows the two most famous mihrabs in the world: the mihrab from the Great Mosque in Cordoba, and the Prophet’s mihrab in Medina.

The lighter vertical column in the center-bottom of the logo, presumably meant to indicate reflected light, even conveys the full vertical shape of a traditional mihrab. The scimitar in the animation is from the flag of the Bosnian regiment of the Nazi SS.

If Obama himself had come up with this crescent logo, one might suspect Islamic intent, given his Islamic heritage. But the logo was not designed by Obama. It was designed by a Chicago based branding firm named Sender, which claims credit for coming up with: “a white sunrise against a blue sky, over a landscape implied by red and white stripes.”

Obama definitely deserves to be made fun of for having a fairly obvious crescent shape in his logo, given his efforts to convince the public that he is not Muslim. This is already an uphill climb, when both his grandmother and his cousin are telling documented lies about their religion, claiming to be Christian in one venue while professing themselves Muslim in another. Lying about being Christian: it’s an Obama family tradition!

Still, there is no indication that the crescent and scimitar shapes in Obama’s logo are intended to convey any Islamic meaning. A genuine coincidence apparently. At the opposite pole is the Crescent of Embrace design for the Flight 93 memorial:



Contrast 1: Architect Paul Murdoch CALLS his crescent shaped memorial a crescent
The Crescent of Embrace name proves that the Flight 93 crescent was and is intended to be seen as a crescent. Only very reluctantly did the Memorial Project change the name, and the changes they made to the design are purely cosmetic. Every particle of the original Crescent of Embrace design remains completely intact in the Bowl of Embrace redesign.

Contrast 2: The Islamic symbolism is overt
It is not plausible that an architect, designing a memorial to people murdered by Islamic terrorists, could be oblivious to the fact that his memorial design is laid out in the shape of a bare naked Islamic crescent and star flag, readily identifiable as a crescent and star flag to airliners like Flight 93 passing overhead.

The Memorial Project simply assumes that the Islamic symbol shapes CAN’T be intentional, which is about like seeing an airliner fly into the World Trade Center and assuming it CAN’T be intentional. Do these people even remember the day they are supposed to be memorializing?

Contrast 3: The Flight 93 crescent contains still further Islamic symbolism
It turns out that the giant crescent points to Mecca. A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is a well known structure in the Islamic world. It is a mihrab (as seen in the above animation), which gives the direction that Muslims are to face for prayer.

Everyone at the Memorial Project is fully aware that a person facing into the giant crescent will be facing almost exactly at Mecca. This according to Flight 93 Advisory Commission member Tim Baird. Again, they all just assume that this MUST be an innocent mistake (the equivalent of seeing as SECOND airliner fly into the Trade Center, and STILL assuming it can’t POSSIBLY be intentional).

Contrast 4: Proof of intent
Paul Murdoch PROVES that the Mecca orientation is intentional by repeating it in the crescents of trees that surround the minaret like Tower of Voices. Below is an animated run-through of the repeated Mecca-orientations (2 minutes).

You can restart the animation by refreshing the page:















Animated GIF: copy and paste. You can email it! (Animation restarts each time email is opened.) Click image for larger animation, if your connection is fast enough (1MB).

Crescent of Embrace site-plan, showing both the central crescent and the Tower of Voices, here.

Contrast 5: the designer's own thematic description is clearly terrorist memorializing
The designers of Obama's logo offer a clearly innocent thematic description of their creation. You can tell just by looking at it what it is MEANT to signify: a white sun coming up into a blue sky over red and white rows of fruited plain. Even the uncanny intimation of the vertical sides of a traditional mihrab is fully explained by the “sun” reflecting off the red and white “landscape.”

In contrast, Paul Murdoch's thematic account of his design is as nakedly pro-terrorist as his crescent and star layout. Murdoch says that the crescent comes from the terrorists breaking the circle. That is, they broke our liberty-loving circle and turned it into a giant Islamic-shaped Mecca-oriented crescent.

As Tom Burnett Sr. put it in his letter to American people, asking for help with our petition to keep the crescent design off of his murdered son's gravesite:

I don’t want to celebrate the terrorist’s circle-breaking crescent-creating feat.

And lest anyone thinks that the giant crescent is no longer present, the Park Service website makes clear that, while the redesign looks more like a circle, the circle is still broken:

The circle is broken in two places that mark the southeastern path of the plane to the crash site. The circle is broken at the entry to the memorial and at the crash site.

The breaks are in the exact same places as before and the unbroken part of the circle (the crescent) remains completely unchanged. It it still points to Mecca. It is still the world's largest mihrab by a factor of a hundred. The only difference is that now a chunk of the broken off part of the circle is included in the design, which is perfectly consistent with its original terrorist memorializing theme. The terrorists still break our liberty-loving circle and still turn it into a giant Mecca-oriented crescent.

So there you have it. Dueling crescents! Obama’s crescent logo exemplifies innocent coincidence (however guilty Obama may be of lying about his religion). In contrast, the Flight 93 crescent exemplifies proven intent. (More of architect Paul Murdoch’s endless proofs of intent here and here.)

To join Alec Rawls' Blogburst List, just send your Blog Name and Blog Url to: caoilfhionn1@gmail.com ~and~(cc)to: alec@rawls.org Subject=Blogburst List. Thank you.

Saudi Authorities Contradict U.S. Park Service: Mihrabs DO NOT Have To Point Exactly At Mecca

target="_blank">src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Blogburstlogoclickforpetition.jpg" border="0" alt="Blogburst logo, petition">

THIS ARTICLE WRITTEN BY: ALEC RAWLS

A Muslim consultant told the Park Service in 2006 that the Crescent of Embrace memorial to Flight 93 cannot be seen as a mihrab (the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built), because the giant Islamic-shaped crescent does not point exactly at Mecca:

Mihrab orientation is either correct
or not. It cannot be off by some degrees.

Saudi religious authorities recently had to address this question when observers noted that some 200 mosques in Mecca itself do not point directly at the Kaaba (the
“Sacred Mosque” that all Muslims are supposed to face for prayer). Meccans who worried that their prayers might not count were href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7984556.stm">assured by the
Islamic Affairs Ministry that “it does not affect the prayers.”

The necessity for such a rule is obvious. Throughout most of Islam’s 1400
year history, Muslims who were any significant distance from Mecca had no
accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. Thus it became established
religious principle that what matters is intent. It is the
mind of the believer that needs to face directly towards the Kaaba,
and directly towards God. This principle applies in Mecca the same as
anywhere else.


All the great mosques of the ancient world point well away from
Mecca

Older mosques often point 10, 20, 30 or more degrees away from Mecca. The
most famous mihrab in the world, the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba
Spain, points more than 45° off of Mecca:







The Cordoba mihrab points south, while Mecca is east-southeast of Spain.


In contrast, the Crescent of Embrace points a mere 1.8° north of Mecca, ±
0.1°, which is highly accurate by Islamic standards.





The Muslim consultant who lied to the Park Service was a classmate
of architect Paul Murdoch!


Who told the Park Service that a mihrab has to point exactly at Mecca to be
legitimate?

It was Nasser Rabbat, a professor of Islamic architecture at MIT
and an expert in the history of mosque design. No one knows better than
Professor Rabbat that mihrab orientation DOES NOT have to be exact.

There is only one reason why Rabbat would lie to the Park Service about such
a basic fact. He recognizes that the giant Mecca-oriented crescent at the
heart of the Flight 93 memorial IS a legitimate mihrab, and he wants this al
Qaeda sympathizing plot to succeed.

A look at Rabbat's background shows that he was a classmate of Crescent of Embrace architect Paul Murdoch, both getting masters degrees in architecture from UCLA in 1984 and both doing their masters work on Middle Easter subjects. (Murdoch wrote a “masters project” titled: “A museum for Haifa, Israel.” Rabbat wrote a
master thesis on house design in Cairo and Damascus.)

This prior connection between Murdoch and Rabbat raises the possibility that
Murdoch himself was able to orchestrate the Park Service investigation into
warnings about his own design. By the same token, having the two classmates
both show up in the Flight 93 memorial raises the possibility that Rabbat
was Murdoch's source of expertise on how to incorporate the full complement
of typical mosque features into his Crescent design. (For the dozen typical
mosque features, see Crescent of Embrace, chapter 5.)

The Crescent of Embrace also includes an exact
Mecca-orientation!


While exact orientation on Mecca is not a traditional requirement, modern
mosque designers do generally employ now-available techniques for orienting
their mihrabs more precisely on Mecca than was previously possible. Murdoch
satisfies this modern norm (and provides hidden proof of intent) by
including a true thematically-defined crescent that does point
exactly at Mecca.

Murdoch's thematic explanation for his crescent design is that the circle was broken on 9/11 by the path of Flight 93. The terrorist-piloted airplane smashes our peaceful circle, turning it into a giant Islamic-shaped crescent(that just happens to point to Mecca). The terrorist-memorializing implications of this theme are hardly less overt than the Islamic symbol shapes themselves. Nothing particularly subtle here folks.

The symbolic breaking of the circle occurs at the upper crescent tip, where
the fifty-foot tall, thousand-foot long Entry Portal Wall is parted by the
Entry Portal Walkway, which follows the flight path through the wall:



The section of wall to the right of the walkway in this image is
symbolically "broken off" by the flight path. Remove this symbolically
broken off part, and the remaining crescent structure points EXACTLY at
Mecca, ± 0.1°:




What symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11: a giant
Islamic-shaped crescent pointing EXACTLY at Mecca.

Rabbat knew about this too, since the original report that Rabbat was
commenting on detailed both the slightly inexact Mecca-orientation of the
full Crescent of Embrace, and the exact-Mecca-orientation that results when
the symbolically broken-off parts are removed. Same for the Park Service. As
the original recipient of Alec Rawls' report,
the Park Service knew about both orientations. They also knew, because it
was also in the original report, that a mihrab does NOT have to point
exactly at Mecca. Yet they still publicly touted Rabbat’s claim that the
crescent can’t be seen as a mihrab because it doesn’t point exactly at
Mecca. A veritable web of self-conscious lies by Rabbat AND the Park
Service.

The design is called a broken circle now, but the circle is still broken in
the same place as before (where the flight path crosses the upper crescent
tip). The unbroken part of the circle, what is symbolically left standing in
the wake of 9/11, remains completely unchanged. It is still a giant-Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing exactly at Mecca.

To join Alec Rawls' Blogburst List, just send your Blog Name and Blog Url to: caoilfhionn1@gmail.com ~and~(cc)to: alec@rawls.org Subject=Blogburst List. Thank you.

Error Theory: Two Memorial Project commissioners quit over the Project’s bad behavior

Error Theory: Two Memorial Project commissioners quit over the Project’s bad behavior

"Does Obama Secretly View Himself As The Messiah?"

************************************************************ As you may or may not have heard by now, a portrait of Obama was commissioned (it is unclear who commissioned it) that was to be unveiled on Wednesday, 29 April 2009, his 100th day in office. The portrait, titled "The Truth," a 30"x54" acrylic painting on canvas depicting Obama in a Jesus-like pose with a crown of thorns upon his head, painted by artist Michael D'Antuono, and marking his 100th day in office, will now not be released.

The artist has canceled the unveiling due to "overwhelming public outrage."

The artist, Michael D'Antuono, said this of his painting:

" 'The Truth' is a politically, religiously and socially-charged statement on our nation’s current political climate and deep partisan divide that is sure to create a dialogue."

According to the press release:

"D’Antuono insists that this piece is a mirror; reflecting the personal opinions and emotions of the viewer; that “The Truth” like beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. D’Antuono expects that individual interpretations will vary as widely as they do in the political arena. The work will be seen by one viewer at a time behind a voting booth-inspired public installation."

Naturally, Obama couldn't be expected to be a man about this whole thing and to make a statement as to whether he was as disgusted by the painting as most Americans are or not. Maybe he likes it and of course he's entitled to his opinion, but why the big secret and all the lying? He's President now, so he might as well come clean. Maybe he secretly does view himself as the Messiah, and he wanted all the accolades, so he was disappointed that the portrait was not unveiled.

I don't believe that he is capable of telling the truth...that's the irony. The painting is clearly sacrilegious and blasphemous, and is offensive to the majority of Christians, which is why there was such a negative public outcry. Obama claims to be a Christian, yet at every turn, he parts with the normal Christian response. That's the "truth" that people are finally starting to see.

Saddam Hussein and Ahmadinejad would make just as good "Mock Messiahs" as Obama would have, and in fact, all three had identical socialist agendas for their countries and ours, with the same sickening agenda for the world, and all without regard for what their people wanted or needed. Evil, power-hungry, megalomaniacs are like that, you know.

Thank God there is only one true Messiah, and that He is still and always will be in control...His name is Jesus Christ. He came to this earth to die for all of us, to pay the price for our sins, so that Death would not have a claim or victory over us anymore. He was hung on the cross and forevermore, He paid the price for our sins, and He rose from the dead on the third day and paid the price, so that now we can have Eternal Life. All we need to do is believe in Him, believe that He paid the price and rose from the dead on the third day. Then repent (turn and feel sorry for) your sins and ask for forgiveness and ask the Lord into your heart. Ask Jesus to become Lord and Saviour of your life. Then you are born again! Furthermore, the angels in heaven will rejoice with you! Hallelujah!

Please let me know if you have made this decision for the Lord, so that I can rejoice with you. It will be the most important decision that you will have ever made. Be sure and tell someone. Find a local church and start reading your Bible. If you don't have a Bible, let me know, and I'll see that you get one.

Until next time...stay safe, stay well and may God bless you all.

Cynde

Please visit my other blogs:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff. Thank you!

"The Million Taxpayer Grassroots March!"

According to the media and the left-wingers, the Tea Parties were either funded by the wealthy...people like George Soros, Steve Forbes and Dick Armey; orchestrated by G.O.P strategists (wow! we must have done a better job of organizing than we thought!); or if Homeland Security is correct, then a bunch of rightwing extremists were in charge. At any rate, the media estimated the attendance at a meager 250,000 (two-hundred-fifty-thousand) people, which would have been nothing to sneeze at, considering the fact that people had to take time off work to attend. But, leave it to the media to misinform the public, because the correct total was more than ONE MILLION!





Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the current Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, stated "This initiative is funded by the high end. We call it "AstroTurf." It's not really a grassroots movement, it's astroturf by some of the wealthiest people of America to keep the focus on tax cuts for the rich, uh, instead of for the great middle class."

"AstroTurf" has been called "democracy for hire" by Political Journalist, William Greider, currently THE NATION's National affairs correspondent. Astroturfing has been further described as a "grassroots program that involves the instant manufacturing of public support for a point of view in which either uninformed activists are recruited or means of deception are used to recruit them."

It is further stated that "unlike genuine grassroots activism which tends to be money-poor but people-rich, astroturf campaigns are typically people-poor but cash-rich," but as you can see, our tea parties were definitely people-rich, thus proving our point that "astroturfing" was absolutely not involved!

One thing that all these tea parties were rich in was a love of the U. S. Constitution. Everyone that attended these tea parties held the same strong beliefs that the document our Founding Fathers had drawn up was a masterpiece and that it was worth defending and fighting for.




"Western New York Tea Party"

• Tea Party Date: April 18, 2009


• Time: 1pm to 5pm


• Location: Club W, 199 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, NY


• Please spread the word !

We, The People were tired of being ignored by our Representatives, and we were demanding to be heard.

Until next time, stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Cynde

Please check out my blogs:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff. Thank you!

"How About A Little Spot Of TEA?"

All across this land of ours, there were in excess of 500 tea parties (inspired by Dr. Orly Taitz) to take place on 15 April 2009, "Tax Day." Americans of all shapes and sizes came out by the thousands to protest, but where was the media? If the media bothered to report on the events, they misinformed the public, saying there were 300 people, when clearly the videos showed a thousand or more; they would say there was a poor showing when obviously there was a huge turn-out; or they just wouldn't show up at all. Time and again, we would hear, "where's the media?" on a video, when you know that if it had been a video of a few gays protesting on a street corner, it would have been covered on the news for sure, and all with a positive spin, even after they had clearly violated someone else's rights.




Here, CNBC is trying to make fun of the Tea Parties, but they are caught unawares when Rick Santelli (God bless him!), the person they thought would agree with them, was man enough to speak the truth, and he told them that he was proud of what they were doing! (Also notice that Rick was not alone in his sentiments--a guy in the background gives him the "thumbs up" sign while he was speaking!) Watch the amazing video for yourself:




I don't think the media were capable of understanding what was happening. Even Pelosi was in denial, trying to say that she knows what the American people want, while right under her nose, millions of Americans were protesting the very things that she, Reid, and the rest of them have been trying to shove down our throats since Obama got into office. Her she is, admitting that Obama's plan for "redistributing the wealth" is what they intend to do, no matter what the people want:




They have been on a spending spree with money that does not exist! Can't anyone see that? While Bush was in office, they were counting the pennies, but now, miraculously, they are blowing non-existent money like there is no tomorrow! I think, besides Pelosi, Reid, Emanuel and Geithner, that we should fire every one of the Representatives that signed that gigantic bailout package without reading it!



"We're Not Gonna Take It Any More!" That's right...and in plain, old English, I think that this video says it best:



Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Cynde

Please visit my other blogs:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff. Thank you!

"Let's Have A Tea Party!!"

p Things are really heating up around the United States. Our citizens are finally starting to wake up and get involved, because they are tired of being under the thumb of our tyrannical, Democrat-led government.

Dr. Orly Taitz of the DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION recently had this posted on her website:

"Dr. Orly Taitz has planned to hit the streets to get the word out about the pressing concerns regarding Obama's/Soetoro citizenship. We need volunteers to help spread the word, gather protesters and travel to Studio City. Studio City, California, is home to many major local news outlets such as ABC and CBS, if you help us, Orly can be interviewed by these media networks and will be able to reach thousands of citizens."





Here are the details of the event:


"TEA PARTY AND PROTEST STUDIO CITY, CALIFORNIA"


Date: April 11, 2009 (Saturday)

Where: Studio City on the corner of:
Laurel Canyon Avenue and Ventura Blvd.

Address: CHASE BANK (aka Washington Mutual Bank)
12051 Ventura Boulevard
Studio City, CA 91604

Time: 1:30 - 4:30pm

Contact and RSVP: Liberty at:
ladyliberty4president@gmail.com


Special Guest: Dr. Orly Taitz

Please bring your protest posters!

See you there!




There are going to be Tea Parties all over the United States, so please look for your local listings and try to attend. If you cannot find where there is one, organize one of your own and let the media know about it.

Furthermore, here is a video that you need to watch. It's incredible! It's called "Take America Back!" Enjoy!



All I can say to that is...We Must Take America Back!
God Bless You and God Bless America!

Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and God bless you all.

Cynde

Please visit my other blogs:
Cynde's Got The Write Stuff ~and~ Cynde's Daybook. Thank you!

"The Global Warming Hoax"

It is inconceivable to me that the American people are standing still while Obama/Soetoro is saddling their families with a $3.55 trillion dollar budget that includes $1.9 trillion in additional taxes (this from a man who "claimed" that he would be lowering the taxes on 95% of the American people). Included in those taxes with be several millions of dollars in taxes under the guise of “The Global Warming Hoax,” which is just another socialist movement for global governance, complete with global taxation on greenhouse gas emissions, despite the fact that hundreds of scientists have tried to tell the media, the government, and anyone that will listen, that it is just hysteria over a normal phenomena that occurs naturally.

During the last century, the media have previously reported on four different occasions that there would be a "Global Climate disaster." They stirred up mass hysteria, just as they are trying to do now, by saying such things as entire countries would be wiped out or that because of the predicted lower crop yields, “billions would die.”

The first panic, in the year 1895, was over an “imminent ice age,” and we all know how accurate that one was. Then there was the long and lingering threat of global warming that the media jumped on when the earth’s surfaced warmed less than one half of a degree in the 1920’s. They clung to that myth until the late 1950’s, when it finally died of its own natural causes. Then, even I can remember the 1975 headlines in the New York Times that read: “A Major Cooling Widely Considered To Become Inevitable,” and last but not least, you’d think they would have been more careful about what they printed after that last doomsday weather report, but I guess that all papers have a little “National Enquirer” within, so in 1981, it was back to the threat of “global warming,” which has revisited us, and with a vengeance.

The only thing different with the reporting now is, they do have a little better flexibility in their reporting. Instead of sticking with the phrase, “global warming,” do or die, which was their original premise, they have changed the phrase to “climate change,” because no matter how hard they have tried to make people believe that the earth’s core temperature was rising at alarming rates due to man's alleged misuse of CO2, they can’t back up their claims with any real facts—there just aren’t any!

Instead, each time, the disasters were resolved by the ebb and flow of nature, just as this non-disaster has done. Al Gore has simply used his fabricated information to get what notoriety he could out of it, because he did not have a very good showing after his election bid, if you know what I mean. You may recall, he freaked out; had a tantrum; grew a beard; he went into hiding; and “poof;” when he reappeared, he had become a granola-head-greenie that seemed to only care about eco-systems and the non-existent global warming problem. Wow—what a man!

Now, I personally have ever so much respect for those who take this subject seriously, who recycle, and who diligently seek out real solutions to conserve our resources and energy. My husband and I also do our part. However, I have done extensive research on this subject, and I recognize the money-grubbing hand of the socialist-run United Nations (UN) and the slimy little fingerprints of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) who are behind anything to do with running our world—especially the United States.

Furthermore, I have had it with Congress and the way they ignore what We, The People ask of them. They have gotten us into a big mess because they have refused to listen to us. The majority is supposed to rule, yet they do as they please; they have simply run amuck! We can no longer stand on the sidelines and just do nothing!

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ~Edmund Burke (1729-1797)



Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Cynde

Please visit my other blogs:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff. Thank you!

DODD AND GEITHNER CAUGHT WITH THEIR PANTS DOWN: They both LIED! They KNEW about the AIG bonuses WEEKS ago!

According to an article in The New York Times, "officials" were aware that American International Group (AIG),was slated to hand out a whopping $165,000 million in bonuses to executives and employees of the failing company, out of the $173.3 billion dollars in taxpayer money that was essentially given to them in the recent bailout package.

In an article for Human Events.com, Connie Hair, a freelance writer for the magazine reported that at a press conference on Thursday (19 March 2009), she asked House Republican leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) about the efforts of the Republicans to subpoena AIG and Geithner records and their communications in relationship to this scandal. Also, due to the fact that Democrat Sen. Chris Dodd and then Sen. Barack Obama were the two largest recipients of AIG campaign cash last year, she asked if there was any evidence of a quid pro quo discovered yet. Boehner's answer to Ms. Hair was, “That’s what we’re trying to find out.”

So, we know that Geithner has been involved right from the start because he was heavily involved in the Bush-era AIG bail-out. Then we have Ben Bernanke who was Fed. chair and he had to know which companies were schedules to receive bonuses--that was his job. Then, Sen. Dodd and the then Sen. Obama, who were receiving very sizable campaign contributions made sure that their buddies were being protected--then and now. And of course we mustn't forget David Axelrod, who was Obama's advisor, and last by certainly not last, nor is he even least, everyone's favorite bulldog, Rahm Emanuel, Obama's Chief of Staff.

It seems that no matter where we look, Obama has surrounded himself with dishonest people and he's also engaged in dishonest dealings. That's nothing new. We tried desperately to warn the American people, but they were in love, so it all fell on deaf ears.

Furthermore, Obama's appointees all seem to have some sort of problem paying their taxes (Obama calls them: honest mistakes") or else they seem misappropriate funds (Obama calls them: "honest mistakes," too.) Somehow, I don't think that if my husband and I forgot to pay our taxes, that the IRS would think it was an honest mistake, even if it was. Remember what Obama tried to do to "Joe, the Plumber?"

Naturally, being the "good guy" that Obama would like us to think he is (he's the guy that surrounds himself with thugs, thieves, liars, and people that hate whites, this country and the Constitution), he's going to take the blame (the "buck stops here," just like Pres. Truman, right, Obama?), but accepting the blame is just not going to cut it this time. It won't solve the problem, and we already knew he was to blame, anyway!

They used to slice out the tongue of the prevaricator, in days of yore, but that is so uncivilized! Now, a spanking is considered too violent by some people. I think the best thing to do is let the Lord handle it. "Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord." Romans 12:19

Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Cynde L. Hammond

Please visit my other blogs, too:
Cynde's Daybook ~and~ Cynde's Got The Write Stuff

The Obamas Have Shamed Our Country Once Again!

When Prime Minister Brown of Great Britain came to the United States at the beginning of this month, he was the first European leader allowed to visit during the new presidential administration, but things did not go well.

The long list of faux pas made by Obama et al began when the traditional joint press conference after their talks was either cancelled or not made at all. Four questions were answered by each Obama and Mr. Brown, then Obama didn’t even ask Mr. Brown and his wife to lunch afterwards. While the meeting that Obama attended subsequently with the Boy Scouts of America was important, I believe that rescheduling would have been more appropriate.

For the gift exchange, Mr. Brown was very careful in selecting thoughtful gifts that were appropriate for the first black president of the United States. First, he gave Obama a pen holder made from the timbers of the 19th century British warship, also known as a slave ship, the HMS President. Slave ships were responsible for patrolling the ocean in search of other ships that may be transporting slaves, so that they could put a stop to it. Furthermore, the HMS President is the sister ship to the HMS Resolute, the ship from which the desk in the oval office was made. In addition, Prime Minister Brown gave him the framed Commission of the HMS Resolute. He also presented Obama with a First-Edition, Seven-Volume Biography of Sir Winston Churchill.

In return, Obama gave Mr. Brown back the bust of Sir Winston Churchill that Great Britain loaned to the American people shortly after the tragedy of 09/11/2001, as a sign of their shared faith. Imagine how that must have made Mr. Brown feel. In addition, Obama’s gift to Mr. Brown, who is legally blind, was a 25-DVD set of American classics, coded: Region One, which means they are incompatible with British DVD players and of no use to him anyway.

Finally, Mr. Brown’s lovely wife, Sarah, bought each of the Obama girls a set of Top Shop dresses with matching necklaces, plus a collection of books by British authors. Naturally, Michelle forgot to get anything for Mr. Brown’s two boys, so someone had to rush to the White House gift shop and buy two helicopters, replicas of Marine One.

All in all, the visit was a disaster, and something I think we should probably get used to.

If any of you would like to apologize for the rude behavior of the Obamas, please feel free to write to the following address:

The British Embassy
Massachusetts Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20028

Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

Do You Regret Voting For Obama?

************************************************************ I keep seeing an ad at the top of my blog from SodaHead.com that says, "Do You Regret Voting For Obama?" Well, that is probably a question that I imagine a lot of people have to do some honest soul-searching to find an answer for. As for me, the answer is simple: I don't regret voting for Obama/Soetoro because I can proudly say that I never voted for Obama/Soetoro!

Unlike the many "sheeple" that had stardust in their eyes, or those that could only see "color," (or should I say, "black and white") I could plainly see what was going to happen down the road shortly after he became president.

I knew that almost immediately people would start seeing him for what he truly is: a chameleon; a shape-shifter; a liar. No, I'm not a fortune-teller. I'm just a person that chose to keep my eyes and ears wide open, and I saw what his track record was; I saw who he chose to keep company with; I heard him back-peddle several times, while the media helped him with his "cover story," almost as if he were their lover in some kind of trouble.

He has proudly paraded tax evaders, one right after the other, in front of us as his choices for his best, most brilliant, and trustworthy picks for his "Cabinet," only to say that, "Gee, I goofed again. They were honest mistakes, I am sure of that." I wonder if any of you remember what happened to "Joe, the Plumber" when he actually did make an honest mistake on his taxes. Obama/Soetoro, his team, and his media pets crucified him; they treated him as if he were Public Enemy Number One, and they were not going to let anyone forget his "offense" anytime soon. And for what? For simply proving to the American people, once and for all, that Obama/Soetoro is a Socialist! His plan for our country is to take money away from those of us that work hard to make it, and hand it over to those that don't or won't. It's called welfare--or redistribution of wealth! What is wrong with that guy?



I think the video above probably fills in a lot of the blanks that you may have had. Dr. Alan Keyes hit the nail right on the head when he said:

"...we are claiming that a bankrupt government can save a bankrupt banking system. Explain to me how that happened, because I think that's impossible. And the fact that we have just elected an individual who may or may not be qualified, and he presents silly ideas like this, and says, "Let's move forward now," and we're all acting like The Laws of Economics have been repealed, and we can actually be able to foot the bill with money nobody's got. This is insane. It's got to lead to the collapse of our economy and it's going to."


So, there you have it. As clear as it can be. The truth. You'll have to decide whether you still want to leave those blinders on or not. It's up to you.

Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.

The Usurper Has Been Exposed!

**Prior to starting this blog, I had just one blog entitled Cynde's Daybook for all of my entries, but then I discovered that I needed to split into three (3) different ones. The posts in the archives of Cynde's Daybook are entitled as follows: Obama: Devoted or Devious; Obama's Pinocchio Ears; and Obama's Dirty Little Secret. They are packed full of information that I don't think anyone should ever want to forget--the man is not to be trusted. Feel free to visit the blog and read those posts, if you have time, and are interested. Thank you.


Several attempts have been made by concerned American citizens from all walks of life, to verify whether or not Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a Barry Soetoro) is, in fact, eligible to hold the position that he now does. This man, whose true name and place of birth we are still unsure of, holds claim to the highest office in the land, calls himself the President of the United States , and expects to be given the respect that the position demands, when he has not even come close to earning it.

Obama/Soetoro has stood by, with his team of paid legal representatives by his side, smugly watching as several concerned citizens (lawyers; military personnel; and interested people from all walks of life)one after the other, sought an answer from the highest court in the land: The Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS). Isn't it a shame that all these people (and more besides are still coming!) were forced to go to the SCOTUS in order to verify whether Obama/Soetoro is eligible to become the President? That is something that we all, as Americans, have a right to have an answer to, but that Obama/Soetoro is willing to pay thousands upon thousands of dollars so that he can avoid answering the question. All he would have to do is present a ten-dollar long form of his original birth certificate; his Indonesian passport; and all his college transcripts. What is he hiding?

According to the United States Constitution, the requirements (simplified) to becoming the President of the United States (POTUS) are as follows:


1.) Must be at least 35 years old.
2.) Must have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years.
3.) Must be a natural-born citizen of the United States.

To explain what it means to be a natural-born citizen more fully, I have taken the information as written by Leo Donofrio in his blog entitled "Natural Born Citizen," where he succinctly and eloquently delineates it further:

In Wong Kim Ark, the court thoroughly discussed “natural born citizen”. And in doing so, Justice Gray quoted directly from the holding in a prior Supreme Court case, Minor v. Happersett. The following passage is a quote from Minor as quoted by Justice Gray in Wong Kim Ark:

” ‘At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.’ Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.”

It is precisely because of the passages above, that no matter what it says on Obama/Soetoro's birth certificate or any of his other documents, (even though I still want to see them, just to satisfy my curiosity) I personally believe that he can never be considered eligible to become the POTUS. Obama/Soetoro's father was not an American citizen and in fact, Obama/Soetoro admits that Obama, Sr. was even a British subject at the time of Obama/Soetoro's birth, right on his own website called FightTheSmears.com

Here is what the site says:

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Therefore, the only possible conclusion is: Obama/Soetoro cannot be considered a natural-born citizen because his father was not a citizen when he was born, which is one of the stipulations that determines whether or not you are natural-born. The exact clause is as follows:

"...all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens..."

In conclusion, Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a Barry Soetoro) is a USURPER and he will never be eligible to become President of the United States of America. Not only that, but he knew it and he committed fraud! I am all for throwing the book at him. He has stepped all over our Constitution and is in the process of doing as much damage to our country as he possibly can.

Open you eyes, people. This man is a threat to the United States! He is systematically taking away every one of the rights that our Forefathers have fought so hard for, and he is destroying our nation's sovereignty and security. We must protect and honor the United States...she needs us now, more than ever!

Until next time...stay safe, stay well, and may God bless you all.